The Lok Sabha has passed the Tribunals Reforms Bill, 2026.
The bill aims to improve efficiency, ensure independence, transparency, and uniformity in the qualifications, appointment of service of Chairpersons and Members of various Tribunals, as well as the administration and functioning of the Tribunals.
The legislation also proposes to establish a National Tribunals Commission (NTC).
The NTC will consist of a chairperson and four members: Two judicial members and two technical members.
It will be chaired by a former Judge of the Supreme Court or a former Chief Justice of a High Court.
Headquartered in New Delhi, the NTC is designed to be an independent body tasked with conducting selection processes for tribunal vacancies, reviewing performance, and managing a new digital repository of case information.
The Tribunals Reforms Bill seeks to bring uniformity and transparency to how tribunal leaders are chosen.
Under the new framework, the NTC will constitute Search-cum-Selection Committees for each tribunal.
These committees will include members of the commission, retired high court judges, and senior government secretaries.
A unique addition is the empanelment of experts from relevant fields to assist these committees in assessing the suitability of candidates.
Crucially, the bill mandates that the Central government must process these recommendations and make appointments within three months of receiving them, a move intended to reduce the chronic vacancy issues currently plaguing tribunals.
To ensure stability and judicial independence, the bill standardises the terms of service across different tribunals.
It proposes that chairpersons will hold office for five years or until they reach the age of 70.
Plus, members will hold office for five years or until they reach the age of 67.
Accountability is also a primary focus.
The NTC will oversee the conduct of inquiries into complaints against tribunal chairpersons and members.
While the Central government retains the power of removal for specific offenses – such as insolvency or moral turpitude – removal on grounds of misbehaviour or incapacity requires a formal inquiry by a committee headed by a Supreme Court judge.
Reducing the data gap, the bill proposes the creation of the National Tribunals Data Grid.
This portal will serve as a comprehensive repository of all case-related information for the tribunals specified in the bill, such as the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal and the National Green Tribunal.
Background
The 2026 Bill is a legislative response to the Supreme Court’s 2021 directive and is aimed at replacing the Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021.
The Supreme Court earlier identified as “inefficiency and lack of independence” of India’s 16 tribunals.
In the same ruling, the SC struck down key provisions of the Tribunals Reforms (Rationalisation and Conditions of Service) Ordinance, 2021, ruling that short tenures, restrictive age criteria, and heavy executive control over appointments violated judicial independence and the separation of powers.
The Tribunals Reforms Bill could reshape the functioning of quasi-judicial bodies in India.
The government aims to “insulate tribunals from executive interference”, which was the legal reasoning of the Supreme Court in the Madras Bar Association judgement.
Even in the landmark seven-judge bench judgment of L. Chandra Kumar v. Union of India (1997), the Supreme Court conceptualised the need for a single, independent nodal agency to insulate tribunals from executive interference.
Here, the top court ruled that the power of judicial review vested in the high courts (under Article 226/227) and the Supreme Court (under Article 32) is an indelible part of the basic structure of the Indian Constitution.
The purpose of tribunals is not to replace courts but to function as complementary institutions in modern governance.
They deal with specialized matters such as taxation, company law, environment, securities market, intellectual property, and other regulatory domains, with the objective of ensuring speedy and effective delivery of justice.