The Supreme Court of India has taken Suo motu cognisance of alleged collusive litigation involving the Bengaluru Development Authority (BDA).
The court examined actions related to 3 acres and 33 guntas of land in Bengaluru North Taluk.
The bench directed the court registry to register a writ petition under Article 32 of the Constitution of India.
The order was passed on July 31 while quashing a First Information Report related to cheating and other offences against petitioner S V Vijayalakshmi and others.
The court exercised its powers under Article 142 of the Constitution to ensure complete justice in the case.
The court had observed that common citizens were denied the benefits of land acquisition due to a collusive legal process between Bengaluru Development Authority and the appellants.
It clarified that failure to submit a supporting affidavit as per Priyanka Srivastava versus State of Uttar Pradesh (2015) is a curable defect, but must be addressed before a magistrate passes an order.
Collusive litigation refers to lawsuits where parties cooperate instead of opposing each other genuinely.
The parties work together to achieve a preferred outcome or to challenge laws without real dispute.