Vice President has opined to revisiting a 1991 judgment delivered by the Supreme Court in K. Veeraswami Vs Union of India.
Kuppuswami Naidu Veeraswami had commenced his legal practice by joining the Madras Bar in 1941.
He was appointed as Assistant Government Pleader in 1953 and Government Pleader in 1959.
On May 1, 1969 he had become the Chief Justice of the High Court.
In 1976, the CBI had registered a First Information Report (FIR) against him for the offences under the Prevention of Corruption (PC) Act of 1947.
He has filed a petition in the Madras High Court in 1978 to quash the criminal proceedings initiated against him.
n 1979, a full Bench (comprising three judges) of the Madras HC refused to quash the investigation in a 2-1 ruling.
Justice Veeraswami moved the SC in appeal, which finally decided the matter in 1991.
The SC had to decide whether a judge of a High Court or of the SC is a “public servant” for the purpose of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947.
The government had argued that, unlike the President and Governors, there is no immunity for judges of the higher judiciary under the Constitution.
In a 3-2 verdict, the SC held that while a judge can be considered a public servant for a corruption case to be registered against him, the sanction must come from the CJI.
In 2019, for the first time, then CJI Ranjan Gogoi gave permission to the CBI to register an FIR against Justice S N Shukla of the Allahabad High Court.
Justice Gogoi’s predecessor, the CJI Dipak Misra, had recommended the impeachment of Justice Shukla, but the government did not act on it.