The no-confidence motion brought by Opposition parties against Om Birla was dismissed by a voice vote.
The Lok Sabha witnessed a 12-hour debate for this.
The tradition has been that when a no-confidence motion is discussed against the Speaker, the Speaker does not occupy the Chair.
These rare motions occurred in 1954 (against G.V. Mavalankar), 1966 (against Hukam Singh), and 1987 (against Balram Jakhar).
In all these instances of a motion, the House was presided over for 14 days by other officers.
The Speaker has stayed away from presiding over the Lok Sabha since the Motion of Removal against him was admitted in the first part of the Budget Session.
BJP MP Jagdambika Pal was in the presiding officer during the debate.
Pal sought the vote of the House, which rejected the motion by a voice vote.
No division of votes was sought as the House was not in order.
According to Article 94(c) under the Constitution, the Speaker can be removed only through a resolution passed by a majority of all the members of the Lok Sabha (Effective Majority), not merely those present and voting (Simple Majority).
The process begins when a member submits a written notice to the Secretary-General of the Lok Sabha seeking removal.
At least two Lok Sabha members have to sign the notice to move a resolution for the Speaker’s removal.
Any number of members can sign the notice, but a minimum of two is mandatory.
At least 14 days’ notice must be given before the motion can be taken up.
Once admitted, the motion requires the support of at least 50 members to proceed for discussion in the House.
The procedural framework governing this process is laid down in the Rules of Procedure and Conduct of Business in Lok Sabha, specifically Rules 200 to 203.
The rules mandate that the resolution must clearly state the charges against the Speaker.
During the debate on such a motion, the Speaker may participate in the proceedings as a member of the House.
And while the Speaker can vote on the resolution in the first instance, he/she cannot exercise their vote in case of a tie.
Article 96 of the Constitution bars a speaker or a Deputy Speaker from presiding over the House while a resolution for his removal from office is under consideration.
The Speaker has a constitutional right to defend himself in the House if the resolution is discussed in the Lok Sabha.
The language of the proposed resolution is usually examined by the deputy speaker, but since the present Lok Sabha does not have a deputy speaker, it may be examined by the senior-most member of the panel of chairpersons.
The panel helps run the House in the Speaker’s absence.