The Supreme Court of India allowed withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment for Harish Rana, a 32-year-old man in a vegetative state since 2013, marking the first court-approved implementation of passive euthanasia in India.
The bench of J. B. Pardiwala and K. V. Vishwanathan permitted withdrawal of medical treatment, including clinically assisted nutrition.
The Court directed All India Institute of Medical Sciences to implement palliative end-of-life care ensuring dignity and comfort.
Medical boards formed by the Court concluded that his condition was irreversible with negligible chances of recovery.
Passive euthanasia means withdrawing or withholding life-sustaining treatment, while active euthanasia (assisted dying) remains illegal under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita.
The legal basis comes from Article 21 of the Constitution of India, which the Court interprets as including the right to die with dignity.
Earlier judgments such as Aruna Shanbaug case and Common Cause v. Union of India laid the framework for passive euthanasia in India.